The Latest Neuromarketing Insights made actionable

“Girl Math” in action

You’ve likely seen the videos: a $500 pair of designer boots is “practically free” because if you wear them every day for three years, they cost less than a cup of coffee. Imagine standing in your favorite boutique, boots in hand, mentally calculating the cost per wear while scrolling through TikTok. While the internet treats it as a joke to justify a shopping spree, it turns out that “Girl Math” is grounded in sophisticated behavioral economics. This isn’t just a trend; it’s a powerful psychological phenomenon known as Cost per Wear (CPW).

When ‘More Ads’ Backfire

Picture this. You’re scrolling through your favorite social app. A few posts from friends, a quick meme, then another ad. And another. Soon the entire feed feels like a sales pitch. Even the brand posts you used to enjoy start to feel suspicious.

This reaction isn’t random. A large-scale meta-analysis by Yin and colleagues (2025) found that the more ads a platform displays, the weaker the connection becomes between user engagement and actual sales. When a social media environment feels too commercial, people still interact with content, but they no longer buy.

That’s a problem for marketers. We’ve been trained to celebrate engagement metrics like likes, comments, and shares as signs of success. But the study shows that context matters as much as content. The same post that drives results on one platform can fail completely on another simply because the platform feels overcrowded with advertising.

Remember the 2017 Pepsi "Live for Now" campaign with Kendall Jenner? The model joined a protest march and handed a police officer a can of soda. Suddenly, the tension evaporated. The crowd cheered. World peace had been achieved by a soft drink.

The backlash was instant. It was not just anger. It was something stickier. Internet users called it a "giant cringe festival". Mentions of Pepsi on social media spiked by over 21,000%. People could not stop talking about it.

As a marketer, you look at that disaster and you shudder. You assume that negative word-of-mouth destroys brands. But new research suggests something more complex is happening in the consumer’s brain.

Cringe is not just an emotion. It is a social signal. Your customers are using your failures to boost their own egos.

The Meditation App That Cracked TV Advertising's Code

Picture this: You're watching your favorite show when a commercial for Calm, the meditation app, comes on. But instead of jumping straight into product features, something unusual happens. The screen shows a simple instruction: "Take a deep breath in... hold it... now breathe out."

You actually do it. For those three seconds, you're not scrolling your phone or thinking about tomorrow's meeting. You're present. You're paying attention. That simple moment just increased your chance of remembering the Calm brand by 500%.

This isn't marketing magic. It's science. And the real shocker? These mindfulness cues don't just work for meditation brands, they boost recall even for completely unrelated products. It's about to change how you think about TV advertising forever.

Finding a marketing goldmine in unexpected situations

Do you take negative feedback with a pinch of salt, or do you react with fervor even at the risk of losing goodwill and customers’ business? Most brands will find themselves the subject of questionable public scrutiny at some point or another, with unfiltered social media channels fuelling unwarranted insults. Common responses include denying the accusations, ignoring them completely, or accommodating to the situation, even apologizing for no real cause.